The Bias Against Marijuana Use in Employment Practices

As a legal expert, it is my opinion that the current bias against the use of marijuana in employment practices is unjust and needs to be reconsidered. The legalization of marijuana in several states and the District of Columbia has brought this issue to the forefront of employment law.

The Conflict Between Federal and State Law

One of the primary reasons why employers are hesitant to allow marijuana use is due to the conflict between federal and state law. Marijuana is still considered a Schedule I drug under federal law, which means it is illegal and has no accepted medical purposes. However, several states have legalized marijuana for medical and recreational use. This conflict has put employers in a difficult position when it comes to the drug testing and employment policies.

Discrimination Against Medical Marijuana Users

Employers who prohibit the use of medical marijuana are discriminating against employees with disabilities. In many cases, these employees require marijuana as a form of treatment for their medical conditions. By prohibiting the use of medical marijuana, employers are prohibiting the employee from performing the essential functions of their job and discriminating against them based on a disability.

The Impact of Recreational Marijuana Laws

The legal use of marijuana for recreational purposes is a new challenge for employers. Employers are hesitant to hire employees who use marijuana recreationally because it is thought to impact productivity and job performance. However, there is no evidence to support this claim, and there are also no reliable tests to determine whether an employee is impaired due to the use of marijuana.

The Need for Objectivity in Employment Drug Testing Policies

Employers need to update their drug testing policies to ensure that they are objectively measuring an employee’s ability to perform their job duties. The current tests used to detect marijuana use only indicate whether the employee has used the drug within a certain time frame, but not whether they are impaired. Employers should consider implementing impairment testing rather than relying solely on the detection of marijuana use.

Pre-Employment Drug Testing

Employers should also reconsider the use of pre-employment drug testing policies. These policies can create barriers for potential employees who may not be able to pass the test due to medical conditions or recreational use. Instead, employers should focus on the ability of the employee to perform the essential functions of the job and make hiring decisions accordingly.

The Impact of Drug Testing on Minority Communities

Drug testing policies have had a disproportionate impact on minority communities. Studies have shown that African Americans and Latinos are more likely to be subjected to drug testing than their white counterparts. This can create an unfair disadvantage for these individuals in the job market.

Racial Bias in Drug Testing

There is also evidence of racial bias in the administration of drug tests. A study by the American Civil Liberties Union found that African Americans and Latinos were more likely to be singled out for drug testing, even when they were not suspected of drug use. This bias can result in a discriminatory hiring process that is not based on an employee’s ability to perform the job duties.

Conclusion

The bias against marijuana use in employment practices needs to be re-evaluated. Employers should update their drug testing policies to ensure that they are measuring an employee’s ability to perform their job duties rather than discriminating against them based on the use of marijuana. Additionally, employers should consider the impact of drug testing policies on minority communities and take steps to address any bias. By taking these steps, employers can create a fair and objective hiring process that benefits both the employee and the employer.

Originally Post From https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/1864-near-total-abortion-ban-in-arizona-raises-questions-about-parental-rights-in-rape-cases/ar-BB1lPkz7?ocid=BingNewsVerp

1864 near-total abortion ban in Arizona brings up concerns over parental rights in rape cases